It’s Shipper Month at Zap2it. Throughout February 2015 we’re exploring TV relationships, both the ones viewers see on screen and those that fans form with their favorite characters and couples, and how it affects what they watch.
The vocabulary contained within is specifically geared toward all things television, since that’s what Zap2it covers, but shipping is applicable to any work of fiction — TV, movies, books, comics, etc. (and even real life, too. Let’s just say you’re not the only person with a possibly unhealthy adoration of the love between Chris Pratt and Anna Faris, two strangers you’ve never actually met).
A brief introduction to the shipper’s vocabulary:
fandom – n – the group of people who are passionate about a specific TV show/movie/book/comic/etc.
ships – n (pl) – the relationships/pairings of a TV show.
shipping – v – the act of wanting a specific pairing together.
shipper – n – a person rooting for a particular relationship.
canon – n – what’s scripted in the TV show; whatever the creators say is fact in the universe where the ship exists.
AU – n – short for “alternate universe,” or anything fan-imagined that would go against the established canon rules/events of the show.
fanfic, fic – n – fan-written stories involving characters from a particular show.
ship names – n (pl) – portmanteau combinations of popular ships, i.e. Delena or Stelena (Damon + Elena or Stefan + Elena from “The Vampire Diaries”)
OTP – n – short for “one true pairing,” or your favorite ship; the people you want to be together most of all.
BROTP – n – the platonic pairings you love most on a show, i.e. Scott and Stiles on “Teen Wolf” or Joe and Barry on “The Flash.”
slash – adj. – homosexual pairings, most often used to describe specific ships or fics, i.e. “slash ship” or “slash fic”
endgame – n – the couple that will wind up together at the end of a story.
Endgame by Samuel Beckett
- Length: 683 words (2 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
As stated by Cohn in her article " 'Endgame': The Gospel According to Sad Sam Beckett" there is much evidence given relating to the many comparable instances between the Bible and Beckett's “Endgame.” With this interpretation as well as the discussion about the significance of the title, and the constant reference to the end of the world, it is nearly impossible to see Beckett's “Endgame” as anything other than a post-apocalyptic tale. I found particularly interesting Cohn's relation to Beckett's Hamm and the Bible's Ham. Ham being the son of Noah, as Cohn states, he is responsible for the survival of life. In the Bible, Ham obeys the wishes of his father, and thus God, and devoted his life to the expansion of humanity and the earth's mere existence. As the Noah story tells, God, unhappy with the world, creates a mass flood that kills the entire world's population, barring a male and a female of every species. This boatload of beings was to start the world anew, to try and make it a better place.
If Hamm is supposed to be a comparison to the Biblical Ham, could it not also be considered the Biblical Ham if things had gone wrong? Hamm, throughout the story welcomes the apocalypse, curses God and is contemptuous to his own existence. If the Biblical Ham had been his contemptuous person, could God not have sent yet another apocalypse to yet again end the world and try again? Is Beckett trying to say that it took more than one try for God himself to get it right? I find this a much clearer reading then one of each character being part of the brain.
The text supports this in many ways, most already supported by Cohn. Her evidence, however, lead me to this conclusion. Her description of the resurrections also works with this theory. The world had many resurrections, all in the pursuit of a better place. Basically I find this play an instance of "What if?" What if Ham (Biblical) had screwed up? What if God’s great plan of the flood did not work?
I also find Beckett's description of the small boy, the glimmer of hope, to be an image of a savior, possibly Jesus. This savior is another attempt by God to make a perfect world. In relating this theory to that of the term "endgame" one can also determine that possible life, humanity is in a constant game with God, or some higher being.
How to Cite this Page
| Endgame by Samuel Beckett Essay example - Beckett is the founder of exploring the meaning of theatrical absurdity. Beckett’s effortless writings over the years, created a unique dramatic persona in his plays that won him the Noble Peace prize. After receiving one of the highest awards known to humanity, he kept a low profile. This period alludes to the satisfaction of reaching his peak. Yet, in his later work, the Endgame makes a direct correlation with the satisfaction of making your peak a plateau. He creates a philosophical predicament in the Endgame of trying to discover the true reasoning for existence, when he could not find one reason why life exists.... [tags: the meaning of theatrical absurdity]|
:: 4 Works Cited
| Essay on Endgame By Samuel Beckett - The mood and attitude of Samuel Beckett’s 1957 play, Endgame, are reflective of the year of its conception. The history that reflects directly on the play itself is worth sole attention. In that year, the world was a mixed rush of Cold War fear, existential reason, and race to accomplishment (Garraty 307). Countries either held a highlighted concern with present wartime/possibility of war, or involvement with the then sprouting movement of Existentialism. The then “absurdist theater” reflected the values and concerns of the modern society (Petty).... [tags: essays research papers fc]|
:: 3 Works Cited
|Codependency in Samuel Beckett's Endgame Essay example - Codependency in Samuel Beckett's Endgame "Clov asks, "What is there to keep us here?" Hamm answers, "The dialogue."" In the play Endgame, Samuel Beckett demonstrates dramatically the idea of codependency between the two focal characters who rely on each other to fulfill their own physical and psychological needs. Beckett accomplishes this through Hamm, who assumes the identity of a kingly figure, and his relationship with Clov, who acts as his subject. In Endgame, this idea is established by tone and humor in the dialogue amid Hamm and Clov.... [tags: Beckett Endgame Essays]||1336 words|
|Essay on Endgame by Samuel Beckett - As stated by Cohn in her article " 'Endgame': The Gospel According to Sad Sam Beckett" there is much evidence given relating to the many comparable instances between the Bible and Beckett's “Endgame.” With this interpretation as well as the discussion about the significance of the title, and the constant reference to the end of the world, it is nearly impossible to see Beckett's “Endgame” as anything other than a post-apocalyptic tale. I found particularly interesting Cohn's relation to Beckett's Hamm and the Bible's Ham.... [tags: essays research papers]||683 words|
|Essay on Nothingness Is Death - Samuel Beckett's Endgame highlights the concept of existentialist philosophy. Existentialist philosophy underlines the isolation of the individual experience in an apathetic universe. It emphasizes on the unexplainable and purposelessness of human existence and accentuates on free of choice. In Europe during the 1960s, the rise of Theater of the absurd gave plot to existentialism. Endgame reflects almost every aspect of existentialism. Samuel Beckett offers in this play a stark, spare representation of the human condition in its emptiness.... [tags: Samuel Beckett's Endgame, existentialism]||1083 words|
| Marxism and Existential Nihilism: An Analysis of Political Intention in Samuel Beckett’s Endgame - Samuel Beckett’s Endgame is a complex analysis of politics in a seemingly apolitical and empty world. As Hamm and Clov inhabit the aftermath of Marxism, they display characteristics of the bourgeoisie and proletariat respectively, but only retain them so they can define themselves as something. The work implicitly argues- through the setting, and by defining Hamm and Clov as the bourgeoisie and proletariat- that political platforms are simply human rationalizations in futile opposition to a meaningless world, pointing towards Beckett’s ideological message of existential nihilism.... [tags: Literary Analysis ]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Beckett, Brecht and Endgame Essay - Beckett, Brecht and Endgame Irish playwright Samuel Beckett is often classified amongst Absurdist Theatre contemporaries Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, Jean Genet, and Eugene Ionesco (Brockett 392-395). However, Endgame, Beckett's second play, relates more closely to the theatrical ideology of German playwright Bertolt Brecht, father of epic theatre and the alienation effect. Through the use of formal stage conventions, theatrical terminology, and allusions to Shakespearean texts within Endgame, Beckett employs Brecht's alienation concept, distancing the audience empathetically from players of the game and instead focusing attention upon the game itself.... [tags: Beckett Endgame Essays]|
:: 10 Works Cited
|Essay about Comparing Synge’s Riders to the Sea and Beckett’s Endgame - Synge’s Riders to the Sea and Beckett’s Endgame 1 1 Introduction Riders to the Sea by John Millington Synge (1904) and Endgame by Samuel Beckett (1958) show many similarities despite the eventful half a century that passed between their years of publication. The similar elements (the setting, the relation of the characters to the outside world, etc., related in detail in the next section) seem to create an atmosphere in both works that is fit for the creation of a new mythology.... [tags: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays]||3321 words|
| Comparing the Absurd in The Metamorphosis and Endgame Essay - The Absurd in The Metamorphosis and Endgame The Bedford Glossary of Critical and Literary Terms defines the Absurd as “A phrase referring to twentieth-century works that depict the absurdity of the modern human condition, often with implicit reference to humanity’s loss or lack of religious, philosophical, or cultural roots. Such works depict the individual as essentially isolated and alone, even when surrounded by other people and things.” (Murfin 2) Franz Kafka and Samuel Beckett were two of the more influential writers in this movement, as both The Metamorphosis and Endgame contain examples of this genre.... [tags: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays]|
:: 6 Works Cited
| Rituals in Everyman and Endgame Essay - Comparing Rituals in Everyman and Endgame "Why do you do that?" "Do what?" "Make the symbol of the cross--you must be Catholic--I see them doing that all of the time." I was eager to know what my friend's response would be. "Yeah," she replied, "I am. It's holy, respect for Jesus and Mary. Sometimes we have to do it as penance after confession." Inquisitively I asked, "I don't get it. So you perform this ritual for different reasons. What are you trying to accomplish when you do it, get into Heaven or just avoid going to Hell.... [tags: Comparison]|
:: 2 Works Cited
Endgame Beckett Samuel Beckett Entire World Instances Noah Wishes Again Conclusion
If humanity makes the right moves we will survive, if we mess up we lose, loss in death. But, however in an endgame situation, the destined loser can only prolong the game. Therefore, through life and worship we are only prolonging our life that will eventually end up in death.
This death throughout the game is the systematic picking off of one player at a time, until the last player is picked off, this may be shown in either day-to-day death or in an apocalyptic manner in which only few players are left. In the situation of the poem, the four characters remaining may be defined as the last players remaining in the game against God. Nagg and Nell, figuratively die when they each return into their pots and never speak again. Clov is leaving as the play ends, and Hamm is left for dead, checkmate. The boy on the horizon may also be seen as the next player in line, the new chance for humanity. It is very disheartening to think of life as this game we play with God.
Beckett uses his farce and comedic devices to help sugar coat this message. I find this play a very trying work to read and interpret. There are so many interpretations out there, which can all be supported in some way or another. However, I find the most support in the relations to Noah and Ham, and to the game of chess. Other interpretations may not wrong, but they may also be humanity's way to avoid the true intended message, but only Beckett can say what he truly meant.